The Wuhan “lab leak” idea takes centrestage, once more

0
149

The “laboratory leak” as the source of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 was denied twice by the team of experts convened by the World Health Organization, which had described the theory as “highly unlikely”.

However, this did not prevent the rumble of disbelief from certain scientific and political circles who believed that a leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology was the source of the virus rather than the area’s wet market, which is reportedly selling live and endangered animals for meat were.

Biden orders IC

In perhaps the most significant voice on the matter, President of the United States, Joe Biden, has asked his intelligence services “to redouble their efforts to gather and analyze information that could bring us closer to a final conclusion,” and in three months’ time Report back.

“In early 2020, when Covid-19 surfaced, I asked the CDC to gain access to China to learn more about the virus so we can fight it more effectively. Failure to bring our inspectors on site in these first few months will always hamper any investigation into the origin of Covid-19, ”said the US President.

The US secret services (IC) have already been charged with the task of checking whether the virus came from human contact with an infected animal or from a laboratory. And the current position, he said, is “that two elements in the IC tend toward the former and one toward the latter – each with low or moderate confidence – the majority of elements do not believe that there is enough information to evaluate one.” be more likely than the other. “

WHO pulls flak

While former US President Trump and other American officials had thrown their weight behind the “laboratory leak” theory, the WHO team of experts had said it was “highly unlikely”. After the first briefing of the WHO team from Wuhan received a lot of flak for denying the option for laboratory leaks, WHO chief Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said that “all hypotheses remain on the table”.

In a later briefing in October 2019, experts pointed to evidence of possible infections and possible sources in China outside of Wuhan, which the world recognized as ground zero of the pandemic. The first official identification of the virus will not come until December 2019. They also mentioned difficulties in accessing raw data, and the asymptomatic cases may have disappeared from the radar.

Recent media reports suggest that researchers have been hospitalized with Covid-like symptoms. While China has disproved these theories, in three months the world will prepare itself to see if it has actually gotten any closer to understanding the source of the virus that has taken a heavy toll worldwide.